-
-
No events on calendar for this bill.
-
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the SenateSenate04/01/2021Passed 1st ReadingSenate04/01/2021Regular Message Received From HouseSenate04/01/2021Regular Message Sent To SenateHouse04/01/2021Passed 3rd ReadingHouse03/31/2021Amendment Withdrawn A1House03/31/2021Passed 2nd ReadingHouse03/31/2021Added to CalendarHouse03/31/2021Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)House03/31/2021Reptd FavHouse03/31/2021Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the HouseHouse03/30/2021Reptd FavHouse03/30/2021Re-ref Com On Judiciary 2House03/17/2021Reptd FavHouse03/17/2021Ref to the Com on State Personnel, if favorable, Judiciary 2, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the HouseHouse02/03/2021Passed 1st ReadingHouse02/03/2021FiledHouse02/02/2021
-
FiledNo fiscal notes available.Edition 1No fiscal notes available.
-
AUDITING & AUDITS
BUDGET & MANAGEMENT OFFICE
CONFIDENTIALITY
COUNCIL OF STATE
PERSONNEL
PRIVACY
PUBLIC
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
STATE AUDITOR
STATE EMPLOYEES
WHISTLEBLOWERS
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
-
126 (Chapters); 126-84
126-85
126-88
126-89 (Sections)
-
No counties specifically cited.
-
-
-
H46: SHRA/Stronger Whistleblower Protection. Latest Version
2021-2022
AN ACT to strengthen state human resources act whistleblower protections.
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
SECTION 1. G.S. 126‑84 reads as rewritten:
§ 126‑84. Statement of policy.policy; duty to report.
(a) It is the policy of this State that State employees shall have a duty to report verbally or in writing to their supervisor, department head, or other appropriate authority, department head or the State Auditor evidence of activity by a State agency department, agency, or institution or State employee constituting that the employee reasonably believes to be any of the following:
(1) A violation of State or federal law, rule or regulation.
(2) Fraud.
(3) Misappropriation of State resources.
(4) Substantial and specific danger to the public health and safety.
(5) Gross mismanagement, a gross waste of monies, or gross abuse of authority.
(b) Further, it is the policy of this State that State employees be free of intimidation or harassment when reporting to public bodies about matters of public concern, including offering testimony to or testifying before appropriate legislative panels.
(c) Any State employee who makes a report under this section in good faith is immune from civil liability that might otherwise be incurred or imposed as a result of making the report.
(d) The identity of a State employee who makes a report in good faith under this Article is not a public record under Chapter 132 of the General Statutes, and the employee's identity shall remain confidential until the matter is resolved or the employee consents to the report being made public.
(e) In addition to its investigative authority under G.S. 147‑64.6B, the State Auditor shall assist State employees in making reports under this section directly to the State Auditor as an alternative to making reports to the employing State department, agency, or institution.
(f) For the purposes of this Article, good faith means honesty in fact with the goal of complying with the duties imposed by this section.
SECTION 2. G.S. 126‑85 reads as rewritten:
§ 126‑85. Protection from retaliation.retaliation for good‑faith reports.
(a) No head of any State department, agency or institution or other State employee exercising supervisory authority shall discharge, threaten or otherwise discriminate against a State employee regarding the State employee's compensation, terms, conditions, location, or privileges of employment because the State employee, or a person acting on behalf of the employee, reports or is about to report, in good faith, verbally or in writing, any activity described in G.S. 126‑84, unless the State employee knows or has reason to believe that the report is inaccurate.G.S. 126‑84.
(a1) No State employee shall retaliate against another State employee because the employee, or a person acting on behalf of the employee, reports or is about to report, report in good faith, verbally or in writing, any activity described in G.S. 126‑84.
(b) No head of any State department, agency or institution or other State employee exercising supervisory authority shall discharge, threaten or otherwise discriminate against a State employee regarding the employee's compensation, terms, conditions, location or privileges of employment because the State employee has refused in good faith to carry out a directive which in fact constitutes a violation of State or federal law, rule or regulation or poses a substantial and specific danger to the public health and safety.
(b1) No State employee shall retaliate against another State employee because the employee has refused in good faith to carry out a directive which may constitute a violation of State or federal law, rule or regulation, or poses a substantial and specific danger to the public health and safety.
(c) The protections of this Article shall include State employees who report in good faith any activity described in G.S. 126‑84 to the State Auditor as authorized by G.S. 147‑64.6B or to the Program Evaluation Division as authorized by G.S. 120‑36.12(10).
SECTION 3. G.S. 126‑88 reads as rewritten:
§ 126‑88. Notice of employee protections and obligations.duties and protections.
It shall be the duty of an employer of a State employee to post notice in accordance with G.S. 95‑9 or use other appropriate means to keep his employees informed of their protections and obligations under this Article.Each State department, agency, and institution shall post notice in accordance with G.S. 95‑9 and use other appropriate means to keep State employees informed of their duties and protections under this section and the availability of assistance from the State Auditor.
SECTION 4. Article 14 of Chapter 126 of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new section to read:
§ 126‑89. Substantiated allegations; savings; employee rewards.
(a) Each substantiated allegation of improper governmental activities made under this Article that involves fraud, mismanagement, or waste of State resources shall be immediately referred to and reviewed by the Office of State Budget and Management (OSBM). Within 90 days of the date of referral, the OSBM shall determine the amount of any savings to the State generated by substantiated allegations.
(b) A State employee who makes a substantiated allegation under this section that results in a savings to the State is entitled to receive a monetary reward equal to twenty percent (20%) of the amount of the savings generated as determined by the Office of State Budget and Management.
SECTION 5. This act is effective when it becomes law and applies to reports made or pending on or after that date.